San Francisco's Mercury News reports that agents seized financial records and interviewed employees from at least one Las Vegas casino last week, visiting the Venetian, a casino and hotel along the Vegas Strip.
A government spokeswoman confirmed the visits, and said that it was believed that Siddiqui had frequented the venue. She declined further comment, saying the search warrants have been sealed.
Mercury News recapped the story that Siddiqui was charged in mid-December on allegations that he was part of a $65 million kickback scheme, where he supposedly charged vendors exorbitant fees to place their products on Fry's shelves, and pocketed the money to pay off huge gambling debts. He was formally charged in January on nine counts of wire fraud and money laundering. The Palo Alto resident is on house arrest and is scheduled to appear in San Jose's federal court Wednesday morning.
John Beckmann, a "casino host" at the Palms Casino who looked after Siddiqui, told the Mercury News in an exclusive interview that he was questioned for "a couple of hours" by two IRS agents last Wednesday afternoon.
"They wanted to know, 'How did Omar pay you?' " Beckmann said he told the agents that on a "couple of occasions," Siddiqui would call him up and say, "meet me at the Venetian." Then, Siddiqui would hand Beckmann a check from the Venetian for anywhere from $1.5 million to $2 million written out in Siddiqui's name. Siddiqui would sign the check over to the Palms, and Beckmann would run the check up to the administrative offices. The Palms is suing Siddiqui for $2.35 million stemming from an August gambling spree.
"That's not common at all," Beckmann said. "Why would the Venetian do that? That's the million dollar question."
Venetian spokesman Ron Reese declined to comment.
But David Schwartz, director of the Gaming Studies Research Center at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas, said sometimes a high-roller will have credit at a particular casino. So, instead of writing a winner a check for $2 million, the gambler may just keep the winnings at the casino for future use.
Beckmann said the Palms was served with a subpoena for all the gaming records involving Siddiqui. He also said IRS agents had subpoenas for several other casinos. Beckmann said he saw the name "Planet Hollywood" on a subpoena.
All News Categories
- General Gambling News (6875)
- Gambling Law & Society News (3451)
- Casino Games (3081)
- Casino Software (2923)
- Land Based Casino News (461)
- Promotions & Bonuses (304)
- Casino Banking (200)
- Casino Tournaments (111)
- General Poker News (53)
- General Sportsbook News (41)
- General Bingo News (38)
- LCB News (36)
- LCB Approved Casinos (21)
- Casino Warnings (18)
- Bingo Software (11)
- Bingo Games (9)
- Predatory Terms (6)
- Online Poker Tournaments (5)
Most Viewed ArticlesSee all
Live activity feed
"I've been watching the second season of the US version of Secrets and Lies and so far I like it a lot more than the first season. Maybe it's the fact that in the first season I guessed the killer from the very first episode, but the second season seems a lot more interesting to me. I've also started watching Designated Survivor on Netflix and the reason why I find the series appealing is because of Kiefer Sutherland. A very different role for him this time around (compared to the ever popular 24h), I barely recognized him. "READ
"For a double spend to happen, someone has broadcast two transactions that share the same input and total more than the available Bitcoin. They will both appear on the network as unconfirmed until one of them is confirmed. Whichever is confirmed first will work, the other one will eventually be pruned from the network as if it never happened. You won't find any trace of it on most blockchain explorers (like blockchain.info) However blockcypher.com does. This is an example It shows the double spend warning and 0 confirmations since the Bitcoin went somewhere else. The same transaction cant be found on blockchain.info. Example You haven't shown any evidence of a double spend (unless I missed something, which is possible) and I haven't found any myself. Assuming this is the players deposit address: 3JciXUmXr4oAQJxRrL51sbKNmEwM7D9g1B (It is definitely an address controlled by cubits)then there were definitely two deposits for 4 Bitcoin Each about 2.5 hours apart. 2016-10-08 02:06:23 3JciXUmXr4oAQJxRrL51sbKNmEwM7D9g1B received 4 BTC, TXID: 67643826693a43411bce4c51713b0491989d14a1346c93e7f84a21b9291e126c 2016-10-08 04:33:47 3JciXUmXr4oAQJxRrL51sbKNmEwM7D9g1B received 4 BTC95594c914e25ecca361b0885dabc663260e9b6547fdd39307810e2c93bdd2e1a The players main address is 1GjEDytM5bKKYtcrYrrd4oDYMyryCCaQev it sent both 4btc deposits and received a bunch of smaller deposits. These addresses were also used in transactions that shared input or outputs with the 1Gj wallet. (No other addresses were used)16ZjTc2sMwkXhiCPMs99dWfJS3sUEor2ps1LKmAMdi9g8TnzbU5FkYyy8dQZQ9WKe94r1JWii56ECnVBQp32nzrQcKdfDWQt5RkmxL None of them are showing any double spend activity on blockcypher. If there was a double spend attempt, what is the address that a transaction was broadcast to that never confirmed? "READ
lcb activities in the last 24 hours
- new members
- members online
- guests online
- new posts
- free games played