The Association, which has some of Europe's largest online betting groups in its membership, welcomed the European Commission’s detailed opinion against the French proposal for online gaming and betting.
The draft legislation is supposed to regulate the online gaming and betting market in France, but is under increasing criticism for only serving to protect the French monopolies Française Des Jeux and PMU, a statement from the Association explained.
Maarten Haijer, EGBA Director for Regulatory Affairs said: “Today’s action by the Commission underlines that online gaming and betting is a cross border economic activity where EC legal requirements prevail. It makes no sense to create a local Internet market in France. We welcome the Commission’s action and are confident that France will reconsider its proposal to avoid litigation”.
The French draft law was notified to the European Commission and the other Member States on 5 March. At the time EGBA had already flagged a number of key provisions that are highly questionable under EC law. These include:
* Limiting the opening of the gaming market to the online segment only
* Limiting the opening of horse betting to pool betting only - justified by the government because it is ´French tradition´;
* Limiting the average pay back ratio (percentage of stakes paid back to players) to the same level of those currently applied by historical operators. There is no evidence or known impact of such a measure on the protection of consumers;
* The proposed license system fails to take into account securities and controls already offered by other EU jurisdictions, in conflict with well known jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice;
* The creation of a ´sports betting right´ in favor of sports federations which hardly can be called a credible means to prevent match fixing, especially when operators already have developed early warning systems to prevent those risks.
EGBA notes that this is the third detailed opinion from the Commission against recent draft legislation aimed at creating a local internet market in France.
The first was issued July 2007 against a draft decree obliging Internet Service Providers to discourage consumers from accessing non French licensed operators. The second was issued in March 2008 against the draft decree on payment blocking. Both decrees have not been adopted since.
“It is clear that the French proposals fail to set the standard for legislating the sector,” Haijer observed.
Today’s detailed opinion extends the standstill period until 8 July 2009, during which time France cannot adopt its draft legislation. If France subsequently decides to adopt this text without taking into account the Commission’s objections, the Commission can immediately launch infringement proceedings.
All News Categories
- General Gambling News (6873)
- Gambling Law & Society News (3450)
- Casino Games (3078)
- Casino Software (2920)
- Land Based Casino News (460)
- Promotions & Bonuses (303)
- Casino Banking (200)
- Casino Tournaments (111)
- General Poker News (53)
- General Sportsbook News (41)
- General Bingo News (37)
- LCB News (36)
- LCB Approved Casinos (21)
- Casino Warnings (18)
- Bingo Software (11)
- Bingo Games (9)
- Predatory Terms (6)
- Online Poker Tournaments (5)
Most Viewed ArticlesSee all
Live activity feed
"Nick i would also like to quote this from you "Essentially it relies on a casino being user-friendly and allowing customers to withdraw cash immediately after they have won money, even with no Blockchain confirmation." Nick your casino does not allow any withdrawals until the deposit the player has made has at least 1 confirmation. It is in your F.A.Q and it even says that when you try to withdraw. That box powered by Cubits or whatever does not allow it when you withdrew. It would say something like "still awaiting confirmation of your deposit" Please try it for yourself to see what it says. It sounds like you dont even understand how your casino works Nick. "READ
"i have pasted my deposit address in the first post which was supplied by your casino. Anyone that knows bitcoin can search it up to see that i have successfully deposited 4 + 4 bitcoins which your casino has onforwarded to your address. You have full possession of it. I only made two deposits which have gone through successfully. Please tell me where the double spend is and all relevent blockchain information so people can verify that information for themselves and we can put this behind us"READ
"Nick please hire an actual bitcoin expert to verify what you are saying. You talk about hashes? That doesnt have anything to do with this. You say you only confirm 1 deposit of 4 btc to you guys? Have you even checked the blockchain reports? Either block explorer or blockchain.info. all blockchains confirm i have deposited 4 btc, withdrew 4 btc and deposited 4 btc again. Meaning 8 to you and 6 back to me (the first 4 i withdrew and 2 the second time around) you guys are 2 on top of me. That article u linked it says a double spend attack is when a user spends the same bitcoin twice succesfully. How have i done that???? I sent u 8 different bitcoins whixh you all have. How have i sucessfully done a double spend attack? Please ask around bitcoin experts and they will tell you this isnt a double spend guaranteed. If you can get someone reputable or post this up on bitcointalk and if the forum members can verify this was a double spend attack then sure i will stop. But this is not a double spend attack. I deposited 4, withdrew 4, deposited 4, then only able to withdrew 2. So i am down 2 bitcoins, how are you saying i am up 2 bitcoins from you guys???"READ
lcb activities in the last 24 hours
- new members
- members online
- guests online
- new posts
- free games played