The Commission found that the U.S. online gambling ban is being enforced mainly against non-U.S. companies, a violation of WTO rules. While a WTO dispute against the United States would be justified, the Commission's report expresses the hope that the two countries can negotiate a solution.
"Internet gambling is a complex and delicate area, and we do not want to dictate how the US should regulate its market," said E.U. Trade Commissioner Catherine Ashton. "However, the US must respect its WTO obligations. I hope that we will be able to reach an amicable solution to this issue."
The report claims that the U.S. continues to allow remote betting on horse and greyhound races through U.S. companies, while cracking down on Internet poker gambling companies in the E.U., which are mainly based in the U.K., Ireland, Austria, Malta and Gibraltar.
The Commission noted that U.S. authorities may wish to make online gambling a purely domestic issue by opting out of international trade rule commitments, but that the U.S. must honour those rules in the meantime.
U.S. laws restricting Internet gambling, and the way they have been applied to prosecute operators, are discriminatory and break World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules, the European Commission said.
In 2006, the U.S. clamped down on foreign gambling operators by passing the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) which attacks financial transactions with ill-defined 'illegal' online gambling sites. The U.S. Department of Justice is still investigating the activities of European listed companies that were active in the U.S. before the UIGEA came into effect, even though all of them pulled out of the U.S. market after the UIGEA became law.
At the end of 2007, the U.S. signed an agreement with the E.U. to compensate European companies affected by the UIGEA. However, the U.S. continued to pursue European gambling firms, and then unilaterally decided to withdraw from its WTO commitments and obligations on international gambling in a hitherto unprecedented move.
Once this withdrawal occurs, the U.S. would no longer be obliged to guarantee future access to its gambling and betting market, the Commission said, but emphasised that such a withdrawal affects only future access to the market, and does not allow the U.S. to disregard its obligations regarding past commitments.
The Commission's investigation started following a complaint from the Remote Gambling Association, a trade body in the UK, which claimed that while prosecuting foreign gambling Web sites, the U.S. continued to allow their U.S.-based competitors to operate. A particularly sore point is the discriminatory nature of US online gambling policies, which allow US horseracing, state lotteries and fantasy sports to accept wagers over the Internet but exclude others.
All News Categories
- General Gambling News (6903)
- Gambling Law & Society News (3459)
- Casino Games (3100)
- Casino Software (2939)
- Land Based Casino News (464)
- Promotions & Bonuses (329)
- Casino Banking (204)
- Casino Tournaments (111)
- LCB News (59)
- General Poker News (53)
- General Sportsbook News (42)
- General Bingo News (38)
- LCB Approved Casinos (22)
- Casino Warnings (21)
- Bingo Software (11)
- Bingo Games (9)
- Predatory Terms (8)
- Online Poker Tournaments (5)