Kentucky Court ruling awaited

"We'll get back to you on this," say judges.

The main focus of industry interest as the week ends was Thursday's Kentucky Supreme Court hearing on whether the state government has the jurisdiction to seize 141 international domain names owned by online gambling companies based beyond the reach of Kentucky enforcement.

The appearance of lawyers to give oral arguments backing up previous submissions to the court is the latest in a series of legal clashes following the state's notorious attempt last year to seize and confiscate the domains (see previous InfoPowa reports).

The case has to date been aired in a district Kentucky court, before a panel of three judges in the Kentucky Court of Appeals and now before the Kentucky Supreme Court as Governor Steve Beshear's outsourced lawyers attempt to reverse court decisions that have consistently gone against them.

Opposing the government's appeal was the Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association, Inc., and the Interactive Gaming Council, two trade associations that have consistently opposed the state's assault on the freedom of the internet and the owneship rights to domain names.

In his address to the court on Thursday, Eric Lycan, a private attorney representing the Kentucky Justice Cabinet argued: "They [the domain owners] have been using these [domains] to violate the law in Kentucky. They are subject to forfeiture."

Attorneys for the state maintain that gambling over the Internet is illegal, and that the state has the authority to stop it from taking place within Kentucky's borders. They say the companies -- no matter where they're based - should either block Kentucky residents' access or face seizure from the state. And they claim that the domain names can be defined as "gambling devices" in terms of Kentucky law.

But, reports Associated Press, the attorneys representing the domain owners disagree, arguing that online gambling isn't illegal in the state because the Kentucky General Assembly has not taken any specific action to declare it unlawful. Furthermore, the state doesn't have jurisdiction over companies outside the state and domain names cannot be described as gambling machines or devices.

Attorney Bill Johnson, representing some of the domain owners, argued that the state has improperly mixed civil and criminal elements in the case.

"The ultimate issue in this case is whether a domain name is a gambling device under the statute," Johnson told the court. "This case should have never proceeded in the beginning."

Attorney Jon L. Fleischaker, who represented iMEGA, said state lawmakers have had the opportunity to make online gambling illegal and have not. Fleischaker also said his clients have not had the benefit of proper due process.

"It is mind-boggling," Fleischaker told the court.

A ruling from the court is now awaited, and could take weeks or even months.

With the completion of the oral argments, the Poker Players Alliance - a players association with over a million members - issued a statement on the issue.

"I am very pleased with the arguments presented today supporting the Kentucky Court of Appeals ruling prohibiting the Commonwealth's seizure of these domain names and I strongly believe we will prevail," said executive director John Pappas. "This case is about more than playing poker online – it's about protecting Internet freedom and the individual rights of Kentucky residents.

"If the Commonwealth is truly interested in protecting consumers, it should put its energy in licensing and regulating online poker – which would also bring in millions in revenue – versus attempting to banish online poker through such a bold, broad and unlawful seizure.

"The PPA looks forward to a positive ruling from the Kentucky Supreme Court and hopes to work with lawmakers in the Commonwealth on the common sense solution of licensing and regulation."

Live activity feed

  • Avatar 26589
    "Aladdins gabby, high noon Gabby1111 Manhattan gabby041"
  • Index
    "Exclusive Winaday/Slotland Halloween Contest -$650+ up for grabs"
  • No avatar small
    "I just started using bitcoin myself. I buy bitcoin using my checking account thru Coinbase. It takes a little longer than using a debit/credit card but if I understand it correctly the fees are lower that way. Then I transfer bitcoin to my wallet at Blockchain before depositing at an online casino. I made two deposits at Slotastic! and one at Slotocash and each time the money was there immediately. The only problem I had was on my first deposit I did not account for the conversion difference when making a minimum amount deposit and my bonus did not get triggered automatically. I got it soon worked out though when I contacted support thru Live Chat and explained the mistake was caused by my first time using bitcoin. They credited my account with the bonus and just suggested I add a little more next time to cover the additional fees and conversion rate differences. I didn't do too good at Slotocash but did much better at Slotastic! and even though I made my deposit using bitcoin there was a message on the Withdraw screen saying I had to send in their Credit Card Authorization Agreement before I could make a withdrawal. I contacted Live Support to clarify and they advised I only had to send in a copy of my drivers license and a recent utility bill to verify my identity not my credit card. After I emailed these documents I received an email the next day advising my documents had been received and approved. I then submitted my withdrawal request and expected an immediate response just like I got on my deposit but it didn't happen. That's been about 7 hours ago now so I'm guessing it might be a day or two at least if I'm lucky before anything happens. But if it happens then that'll be much better than having to wait weeks or months like some have to. I'll update later when the withdrawal is finally completed."
  • Index
    "never any spins for me. im depositor. also asked chat they said only selected players.  "
  • Photo
    "blue day thank you very much."
  • No avatar small
    "Partypoker. Not bad desire:"
Swipe left or right to see more

lcb activities in the last 24 hours

  • 39
    new members
  • 563
    members online
  • 16176
    guests online
  • 118
    new posts
  • 2136
    free games played
Join the club

Highest Community Rated Online Casinos

Swipe left or right to see more

Latest forum posts

Join today and start earning rewards

You will immediately get full access to our online casino forum/chat plus receive our newsletter with news & exclusive bonuses every month.
S logo

Report to moderator

Use this function to inform the moderators and administrator of an abusive or wrongly posted message.

Please note that your email address will be revealed to the moderators if you use this

Select Language
Search Results