With all the furore over government corruption and draconian new anti-gambling regulations going on in Poland over the past month, it is not surprising that observers have lost sight of a draft due for discussion next week on Internet gambling measures. And the content does not look promising.
The Office of the Committee for European Integration (UKIE) brought the issue back into sharp focus this week when it criticised the Polish government draft measures for the control and presumably restriction of online gambling. The publication Gazeta Wyborcza picked up the comments, which were subsequently carried by other Polish media outlets.
UKIE apparently does not like provision in the regulations that suggest ISP blocking, a move which the Australian and Italian governments discovered the hard way is guaranteed to get both taxpayers and Internet freedom bodies in a censorship lather.
Gazeta Wyborcza claims that there are several hundred thousand players in Poland who gamble on the internet and will not accept censorship easily.
"Officially, online gambling is currently forbidden however there are no tools to execute these regulations," the publication reports.
The new regulations envisage that Internet service providers would have to block access to internet sites at the direction of government officials from the Polish tax offices, the Internal Security Agency (ABW) or the police, a prospect that raises the spectre of official and possibly covert censorship.
In the Australian debacle the government agency concerned had to face some embarrassing questions regarding nonsensical and irrelevant bans imposed by uninformed government bureaucrats (see previous InfoPowa reports).
Like the Australian issue last year, Polish bureaucrats plan to build a register of forbidden Internet sites, which will also include paedophile and Fascist related websites. Before the draft bill is voted on in the Sejm it will have to be sent to the European Commission to assure that it does not violate any rights, as Poland is a member nation in the EU.
Meanwhile, reports on the overall ban on gambling outside of casinos in Poland indicate that the sections of the new law that prohibit marketing and advertising of non-casino gambling may not apply to foreign companies involved in lucrative sports sponsorships with Polish football clubs.
Observers claim that companies falling into this category have been exempted from the advertising provisions insofar as they will be permitted to display their company names or other branding and marking on shirts, banners and billboards. But no advertising directing customers to websites is permitted.
Companies such as Expekt, Bwin, Unibet and Betclic are all known to be involved in multi million Euro sponsorships with prominent Polish football clubs, and the consequences of interfering with these arrangements have been pointed out to the politicians by senior football authorities.
All News Categories
- General Gambling News (6875)
- Gambling Law & Society News (3451)
- Casino Games (3078)
- Casino Software (2921)
- Land Based Casino News (460)
- Promotions & Bonuses (303)
- Casino Banking (200)
- Casino Tournaments (111)
- General Poker News (53)
- General Sportsbook News (41)
- General Bingo News (38)
- LCB News (36)
- LCB Approved Casinos (21)
- Casino Warnings (18)
- Bingo Software (11)
- Bingo Games (9)
- Predatory Terms (6)
- Online Poker Tournaments (5)
Most Viewed ArticlesSee all
Live activity feed
"I do not understand if they told me in supporting the truth when I now communicate with them, you need between the bonuses, the chips need to make deposits was 1500 rubles (I did not know I had this time the amount is less than 1,500 rubles total deposits my between the chip 585 rubles). That is why they were the first to say, to write about it immediately and everything would be clear and clear and would not have had much time to wait and negotiate and I no longer have to make deposits of up to 1,500 rubles, I'm out of this situation, yet it not afraid to dare make deposits in LimoPlay and make deposits in other casinos. The second reason they could not even if I personally write a letter explaining that so and so to you, I'm not supposed bonus to tie that small sum made deposits between the chip, the more I turn to them not once but several of help and explanations. Third, I do not understand why they gave me and you to show that they have given me the chip, on October 19, if I did not receive not 19, not October 20 and until now I have not received. Fourth me support, they explain, they say one thing while you write something else. To me, they say that I did not give the chip a little as I did need to make deposits and deposits at least 1,500 rubles to get another chip, and at the same time, you write that they gave me the chip and I have played him and kak if I were still $ 0.19, and the chip is active until 26 October. Here are those questions I would like to get answers very interesting to see and hear their opinion about it all, there is not in their actions, reports any logic do not you think? Or is poor awareness or simply banal error occurred and confused me with another person, player. Thank you bye."READ
lcb activities in the last 24 hours
- new members
- members online
- guests online
- new posts
- free games played