Update: Online Gambling Briefings at Washington DC Completed

The concept triggers no actual opposition

Despite its controversy, Washington DC's legalisation of intrastate online gambling seems to have a good standing, even after eight public consultation briefings.

Namely, it has been reported by the Washington Post that the briefings, conducted by the Washington DC Lottery at the request of some factions within the council, who were unhappy with the manner in which the legislation had been pushed through, proved that very few city residents hold something against the notion of government-sponsored online gambling.

Some of the most important issues referred to in the briefings included the technology available to ensure player protection and the exclusion of problem gamblers and the underaged, as well as where would the revenues generated by the pastime be spent.

Some of the public comments, reported by the Washington Post, were the following:

“Nine million dollars is nine million dollars.” (The expected initial revenues).

“There’s nothing wrong with the District being first (to legalize online gambling in the States).”

“The District needs the money.”

“It’s just as good as the lottery; it’s the same thing.”

“I’d rather gamble my money in my home town rather than driving to [Atlantic City].”

In a comment on this, the newspaper opined: "That the populace, by and large, has given online gambling its retroactive approval has made the questions about its origins more puzzling."

In addition, the newspaper also looked into the manner in which Councillor Brown drove the measure through to its present standing as an approved city enabling law.

"Why, after all, would you try to slip what appears to be a popular proposal through the back door, when the front door would have caused a lot fewer headaches?"

Live activity feed

  • No avatar small
  • No avatar small
    Bonanza game logo

    Bonanza Game Casino

    / 10 votes
  • Index
    "Drawing a line under this now.  Problem solved - see my private message to you.. "
  • Alenvers
    " MelissaN wrote: Hi claralie, The rep has been notified again and hope he'll get back to us soon with the clarification.  THANK You Melissa i see your post just  now ( 9 hours after) yes  sure there is a reaction  without an email or any explanation they cancelled my  pending winnings of  $200- this morning they was always in pending in my account. WOOOO real gentlemen - nothing at least as usual - they cant say the contrary of their last email i think.How explain that one day before as they rules said i am  not eligible for a bonus and one day after i am eligible ?and the problem is that i won the first day so how be clear when the second day i became eligible for  a  bigger bonus and that i have te permission to cashout ..but.nothing i lost.   there  will be any explanation I think:the only available that works in any same kind of   situation is that rules  can be changed as and when and how the casino wants - rules - no rules what importance  it was  a  freebie why will they pay ?i am stupid this is  the explanation. "
  • No avatar small
    Sign Up Bonus
    Lord lucky logo

    Lord Lucky Casino

    / 13 votes
  • Tumblr nsdzsdacgp1s7vusdo1 250
    Expires on 27th Oct 2016
    Vip stakes

    VIP Stakes

    / 279 votes
Swipe left or right to see more

lcb activities in the last 24 hours

  • 45
    new members
  • 577
    members online
  • 15905
    guests online
  • 118
    new posts
  • 106
    free games played
Join the club

Highest Community Rated Online Casinos

Swipe left or right to see more

Latest forum posts

Join today and start earning rewards

You will immediately get full access to our online casino forum/chat plus receive our newsletter with news & exclusive bonuses every month.
S logo

Report to moderator

Use this function to inform the moderators and administrator of an abusive or wrongly posted message.

Please note that your email address will be revealed to the moderators if you use this

Select Language
Search Results