Party Gaming: We Were Just a Megaupload Advertiser

Party Gaming: We Were Just a Megaupload Advertiser DoJ singles out Party Gaming for mention in 72 page indictment – the question is why?

One of the many questions posed about the US Department of Justice copyright action against the Hong Kong-based giant file sharing site Megaupload is why the authorities chose to single out Party Gaming for mention in the 72 page indictment, when the company was just an advertiser, like many others.

A protest has been filed this week by Party Gaming parent group digital entertainment, repeating that it was only one of a number of advertisers on the site and wondering the same – why was it the only one to be mentioned.

Further development in the US action against Megaupload leader Kim Schmitz aka Dotcom and three of his employees living in New Zealand is still awaited – they stand charged by the DoJ in America of facilitating millions of illegal downloads of films, music and other content, costing copyright holders at least $500 million in lost revenue.

Join today and start earning rewards

You will immediately get full access to our online casino forum/chat plus receive our newsletter with news & exclusive bonuses every month.
S logo

Report to moderator

Use this function to inform the moderators and administrator of an abusive or wrongly posted message.

Please note that your email address will be revealed to the moderators if you use this

Select Language
Search Results