The latest news from the European Court of Justice’s preliminary ruling in the joint cases Costa and Cifone on access to Italian gambling licenses by European operators, involve reports that, once again, the court has ruled that regulated markets must operate in a transparent and fair way, providing equal possibilities to foreign companies trying to enter them from other EU nations
The court also warned that the EU law prohibits national legislation to protect the market position of incumbents and that a national restriction is justifiable only if it does “not have as a true objective the protection of the market positions of the existing operators”.
It is also said in the ruling that “The very fact that existing operators have been able to start up several years earlier than the operators unlawfully excluded confers on them an unfair competitive advantage [which] constitutes a new breach of Articles 43 EC and 49 EC and of the principle of equal treatment.
"The objective of ensuring continuity, financial stability or a proper return on past investments for operators cannot be accepted as overriding reasons in the public interest" it added, also noting that in cases where nations justify restrictions on grounds of reducing gaming opportunities and combating criminality this cannot stand where the Member States "has long been marked by a policy of expanding activity with the aim of increasing tax revenue."
This decision represents a serious blow to Italian regulators, as the court found that the Italian gambling legislation is not consistent when it claims that its objectives are to protect consumers from gambling addiction and limit gambling activity in Italy. On the contrary, the court opined that the Italian legislation merely aims at protecting incumbents and increasing tax revenues, a goal that cannot serve to justify violations of EU law.
According to Sigrid Ligné, Secretary General of the European Gaming and Betting Association, “This very positive ruling confirms that national legislation that opens up and regulates the gambling market may not discriminate against new operators but must guarantee fair market access.
“The Court has made particularly clear the ‘red lines’ that Member States must observe when they regulate gambling; it is high time for the European Commission to enforce the consistent case law of the CJEU and pursue complaints and infringements procedures accordingly ”
It has been added by Stanleybet, a company that claims this ruling recognizes for the third time that Stanleybet was discriminated by the Italian licensing system:
“Stanleybet has received from the CJEU a definitive recognition of its right to enter the Italian market under conditions of equality and fairness vis-a-vis the other national operators.”
In addition, David Purvis, CEO of Stanleybet, said: “This ruling confirms once again that Stanleybet was discriminated against by the Italian Republic. After twelve years of legal battles, this third CJEU ruling must surely put an end to the unlawful distortions, the discrimination and the unjust limitations of the Italian licensing system.
"The European Commission must also take heed from this following its 2010 decision to close the Italian infringement proceedings. The decision of the CJEU indicates that this closure was premature. I hope this is a lesson to be learned and from now on the Commission will not allow political considerations to overtake EU law in other jurisdictions such as France, Greece and Germany.”
All News Categories
- General Gambling News (6875)
- Gambling Law & Society News (3451)
- Casino Games (3078)
- Casino Software (2921)
- Land Based Casino News (460)
- Promotions & Bonuses (303)
- Casino Banking (200)
- Casino Tournaments (111)
- General Poker News (53)
- General Sportsbook News (41)
- General Bingo News (38)
- LCB News (36)
- LCB Approved Casinos (21)
- Casino Warnings (18)
- Bingo Software (11)
- Bingo Games (9)
- Predatory Terms (6)
- Online Poker Tournaments (5)
Most Viewed ArticlesSee all
Live activity feed
" halibaker wrote: aymenpronet wrote: Hi, Is this bonus still available or not ?? I want to register on the casino. I registered yesterday they said only Germany Switzerland Finland Austria will get no deposit bonus via SMS, other countries could claim on live chat but are now not eligible (since 10 october) double check those counties I gave though, this is just from memory from my 2 min chat with support. Thank you halibaker for your quick answer.. I will check with live chat support..If they will not give me no deposit bonus I will not register."READ
"I do not understand if they told me in supporting the truth when I now communicate with them, you need between the bonuses, the chips need to make deposits was 1500 rubles (I did not know I had this time the amount is less than 1,500 rubles total deposits my between the chip 585 rubles). That is why they were the first to say, to write about it immediately and everything would be clear and clear and would not have had much time to wait and negotiate and I no longer have to make deposits of up to 1,500 rubles, I'm out of this situation, yet it not afraid to dare make deposits in LimoPlay and make deposits in other casinos. The second reason they could not even if I personally write a letter explaining that so and so to you, I'm not supposed bonus to tie that small sum made deposits between the chip, the more I turn to them not once but several of help and explanations. Third, I do not understand why they gave me and you to show that they have given me the chip, on October 19, if I did not receive not 19, not October 20 and until now I have not received. Fourth me support, they explain, they say one thing while you write something else. To me, they say that I did not give the chip a little as I did need to make deposits and deposits at least 1,500 rubles to get another chip, and at the same time, you write that they gave me the chip and I have played him and kak if I were still $ 0.19, and the chip is active until 26 October. Here are those questions I would like to get answers very interesting to see and hear their opinion about it all, there is not in their actions, reports any logic do not you think? Or is poor awareness or simply banal error occurred and confused me with another person, player. Thank you bye."READ
lcb activities in the last 24 hours
- new members
- members online
- guests online
- new posts
- free games played