Consumer Activist Responds to Anti Online Gambling Editorial

Consumer activist Michelle Minton responded to US politician Wellington Webb's anti-online gambling editorial supporting Sheldon Adelson's war against online gambling.

Wellington wrote “The hidden dangers of Internet gambling” mentioning the Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling’s (CSIG) line that online gamblers are "chumps" also claiming that it’s more addictive than other types of gambling.

"An [federal] online gambling ban will do nothing to protect consumers - but it will protect the profits of brick-and-mortar casino owners like Webb’s boss, Sheldon Adelson," Minton wrote.

She examined the facts behind the 1961 Wire Act which Adelson wants to reinstate.

"Webb erroneously claims that the U.S. enacted a federal online gambling ban in 1961 with the passage of the Wire Act, which was intended to target mobsters engaged in sports wagering. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, the Wire Act’s architect and principal supporter, had no intention of imposing a federal ban on gambling," she said.

"His targets were organized crime syndicates whose activities crossed state lines. Specifically, he was interested in targeting the “kingpins of the rackets” rather than their underlings.

"In testimony on the Wire Act, Kennedy only talked about the mob's activity involving horse racing and “such amateur and professional sports events as baseball, basketball, football and boxing. He also made it clear that the Wire Act was intended to assist states in enforcing their laws on gambling, not to create a federal ban on the activity.

“Kennedy testified that ‘the federal government is not undertaking the almost impossible task of dealing with all the many forms of casual or social wagering.’”

In closing, Minton said, "Webb may think online gamblers are “chumps,” but criminalizing the activity hasn’t and won’t make them stop. State authorities already have the ability to decide what consumer protection tools their licensed online casinos should adopt. The only way to protect consumers from any threat posed by online gambling is to bring the activity out of the dark."

Here’s the editorial in its entirety: The Hidden Dangers of Internet Gambling

  • Jade lcb

    jade

      Hero Member
    • female
    • online
    • 407
      thanks given
    • 364
      thanks received
    Minton says the kinds of things we need to have repeated. Like the Wire Act was intended to target mobsters. It was not to impose a federal ban on gambling. Also criminalizing the activity hasn’t and won’t make them stop. States already have the ability to decide what consumer protection tools their licensed online casinos should adopt. And finally, the only way to protect consumers from the threats that are posed by online gambling is to bring the activity out of the dark, legalize it, legalize online gambling. It really is the only way to go, isn't it............
  • No avatar medium

    iki

      Newbie
    • offline
    • 0
      thanks given
    • 0
      thanks received
    "Consumer activist Michelle Minton responded to US politician Wellington Webb's anti-online gambling editorial supporting Sheldon Adelson's war against online gambling. Wellington wrote “The hidden dangers of Internet gambling” mentioning the Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling’s (CSIG) line that online gamblers are "chumps" also claiming that it’s more addictive than other types of gambling.", I say that everyone is entitled to their choice!

Join today and start earning rewards

You will immediately get full access to our online casino forum/chat plus receive our newsletter with news & exclusive bonuses every month.
S logo

Report to moderator

Use this function to inform the moderators and administrator of an abusive or wrongly posted message.

Please note that your email address will be revealed to the moderators if you use this

Select Language
Search
Search Results
39012170