The Tasmanian government plans for the disposal of the Tasmanian Tote

The Tasmanian government treasurer, Michael Aird, has published plans for the disposal of the Tasmanian Tote in order to increase funding to the horse racing industry. In a statement released this week, Aird said that relevant legislation will be presented to Parliament in the autumn which will amend the Gaming Control Act 1993 to bring the Tote under the authority of the Tasmanian Gaming Commission prior to its sale through a competitive bidding process.

The process would include the appointment of an independent probity adviser who will oversee the sale process to ensure it is conducted openly and fairly.

"The divestment will help in improving Tote's competitive position compared to the other privatised TABs in New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and South Australia," Aird said. "Maintaining a wagering business in public ownership is not a core function of Government.

"The proceeds of the sale, which we hope will be finalised by the end of June 2009, will be reinvested into other state assets.

"The sale of Tote is consistent with most other Australian States and Territories which have also sold their wagering businesses with only Western Australia and the Australian Capital Territory still with government-owned totalisators".

Aird said the government would work to ensure, where possible, that Tote Tasmania staff retained their jobs and existing conditions under private ownership. "All accrued entitlements for staff at the sale date will be preserved," he said, revealing that with the transfer of its racing functions to the Tasmanian Racing Board, Tote Tasmania employs around 100 full time staff.

"Bidders will be asked to submit their intentions regarding employment levels and employment terms and conditions. These submissions will then be considered when evaluating overall proposals," said Aird.

The amendments envisaged to the Gaming Control Act will subject Tote Tasmania to regulation by the Tasmanian Gaming Commission, consistent with other wagering operators such as Betfair, and will also result in Tote Tasmania paying wagering tax directly to the Consolidated Fund.

"The Tasmanian Racing Board, the body that is now responsible for distributing funding to the industry, will be funded from the State Budget," explained Aird, adding that the sale of Tote Tasmania will provide opportunities to increase funding to the Tasmanian Racing Industry.

"I can guarantee that the Tasmanian Racing Industry will not be worse off by these arrangements," Aird promised. "The Tasmanian Government will separately fund the racing industry and over the coming months a long-term funding model will be developed in consultation with the new Tasmanian Racing Board and Tote Tasmania.

"The clear aim in developing the funding model will be to increase funding to the industry and ensure its long-term sustainability."

The Tasmanian government believes there are three principles that will be central to any future funding model for the Tasmanian Racing Board:

* Sustainability and revenue predictability for the Tasmanian racing industry

* Funding for an appropriate level of capital works; and

* Funding to enable the Tasmanian Racing Board to develop the Tasmanian racing product.

Tote's capital commitments, including A$6 million for lights at Tasman Park in Launceston, would not be affected by the sale.

Aird remarked that the timing for the sale of Tote was appropriate. "While economic conditions are volatile, good assets can still be sold with a strong return," he said.

"Tote Tasmania is a unique business and I am sure it will attract significant buyer interest despite the volatile markets because, importantly, most of the likely bidders still have access to capital."

Aird has appointed Deloittes as the government's financial adviser and Clayton Utz as its legal adviser. Any interested bidders should direct their queries to:

David Willington
Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited
Level 3, 225 George Street
Sydney, NSW, 2000

Live activity feed

  • Rzgq3
    "I've been watching the second season of the US version of Secrets and Lies and so far I like it a lot more than the first season. Maybe it's the fact that in the first season I guessed the killer from the very first episode, but the second season seems a lot more interesting to me.  I've also started watching Designated Survivor on Netflix and the reason why I find the series appealing is because of Kiefer Sutherland. A very different role for him this time around (compared to the ever popular 24h), I barely recognized him. "
  • Rzgq3
    "You have the same drop down menu where you can narrow your Serch criteria in the No Deposit Bonus section. Just choose the software you prefer and it will list the casinos that are powered by that software and accept players from your country.   "
  • Me
    Magic fruits

    Magic Fruits

    / 56 votes
  • Avatar
    "check accounts for 10 spins on Fairytale Legens. Info mail"
  • Index
    "For a double spend to happen, someone has broadcast two transactions that share the same input and total more than the available Bitcoin. They will both appear on the network as unconfirmed until one of them is confirmed. Whichever is confirmed first will work, the other one will eventually be pruned from the network as if it never happened.  You won't find any trace of it on most blockchain explorers (like However does. This is an example It shows the double spend warning and 0 confirmations since the Bitcoin went somewhere else. The same transaction cant be found on Example   You haven't shown any evidence of a double spend (unless I missed something, which is possible) and I haven't found any myself. Assuming this is the players deposit address: 3JciXUmXr4oAQJxRrL51sbKNmEwM7D9g1B (It is definitely an address controlled by cubits)then there were definitely two deposits for 4 Bitcoin Each about 2.5 hours apart. 2016-10-08 02:06:23 3JciXUmXr4oAQJxRrL51sbKNmEwM7D9g1B received 4 BTC, TXID: 67643826693a43411bce4c51713b0491989d14a1346c93e7f84a21b9291e126c 2016-10-08 04:33:47 3JciXUmXr4oAQJxRrL51sbKNmEwM7D9g1B received 4 BTC95594c914e25ecca361b0885dabc663260e9b6547fdd39307810e2c93bdd2e1a The players main address is 1GjEDytM5bKKYtcrYrrd4oDYMyryCCaQev it sent both 4btc deposits and received a bunch of smaller deposits. These addresses were also used in transactions that shared input or outputs with the 1Gj wallet. (No other addresses were used)16ZjTc2sMwkXhiCPMs99dWfJS3sUEor2ps1LKmAMdi9g8TnzbU5FkYyy8dQZQ9WKe94r1JWii56ECnVBQp32nzrQcKdfDWQt5RkmxL None of them are showing any double spend activity on blockcypher. If there was a double spend attempt, what is the address that a transaction was broadcast to that never confirmed?        "
    Started by
    Banking icon 9
  • £50
    Sign Up Bonus

    Whirlwind Slots Casino

    / 13 votes
Swipe left or right to see more

lcb activities in the last 24 hours

  • 36
    new members
  • 577
    members online
  • 17993
    guests online
  • 134
    new posts
  • 6009
    free games played
Join the club

Highest Community Rated Online Casinos

Swipe left or right to see more

Latest forum posts

Join today and start earning rewards

You will immediately get full access to our online casino forum/chat plus receive our newsletter with news & exclusive bonuses every month.
S logo

Report to moderator

Use this function to inform the moderators and administrator of an abusive or wrongly posted message.

Please note that your email address will be revealed to the moderators if you use this

Select Language
Search Results