A 90-year-old Pauline McKee from Illinois, who thought she won $41.8m (£27.6m) on a video slot machine, lost a court case and subsequently was denied a payout.
The Illinois grandmother was playing Miss Kitty from Aristocrat at a casino when she won 185 credits or $1.85. At that moment a message pop out appeared on the screen showing a staggering bonus win of $41,797,550.16. For a second grandma Pauline thought she was the luckiest woman on earth but the casino refused to pay saying it was a computer glitch.
Ms. McKee sued the casino but the Iowa Supreme Court eventually threw out her case. Pauline who has 13 grandchildren, was planning to help her children financially, but “it wasn’t meant to be”, claims saddened grandma.
"I had my doubts from the start, because that's a lot of money for a penny machine," she told the Chicago Tribune.
The casino argued that the on-screen rules clearly indicated that "malfunction voids all pays and plays". The investigation was carried out by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission (IRGC), which secured the machine sending the hardware and software to an independent testing laboratory. It was concluded that the software was programmed to allow a bonus of up to $10,000, but the investigators couldn't work how the multi-million bonus message had occurred.
The machine's maker, Aristocrat Technologies, said it had been aware of this type of error in the display and suggested "component degradation over time may increase the susceptibility to this rare occurrence".
The IRGC concluded that the bonus display was "not valid" and that "the slot machine game malfunctioned." Ms. McKee sued the casino in 2012 claiming breach of contract and consumer fraud and the case was finally rejected by the Iowa Supreme Court on 24 April.
Illinois Grandmother denied $41.8m Jackpot Payout
Back
Gambling Law & Society News
Back to articles
Was this article helpful?
Your Feedback
Please enter your comment.
Your comment is added.
Member's feedback (3)
All Article Categories
- General Gambling News (6818)
- Casino Games (5532)
- Gambling Law & Society News (3481)
- Casino Software (3040)
- Tournaments, Promos & Bonuses (1373)
- LCB News (950)
- Sports Events (835)
- Land Based Casino News (630)
- Casino Banking (294)
- Bitcoin & Crypto News (281)
- From the Players for the Players (166)
- Casino Warnings & Rogue Reports (109)
- LCB Monthly News Reports (87)
- Upcoming new casinos (73)
- LCB Approved Casinos (33)
- Sportsbook Sponsorship (27)
- Predatory Terms (15)
- Upcoming Sporting Events (4)
- Live Sports Betting (1)
sharpe 8 years ago
That is really unfair, this 90-year-old woman Pauline McKee had a tough luck in the case. I think she have to be compensated in some kind, at least with the 10 000$ what is the maximum bonus of this slot. This lady have a really great spirit to still playing at this age, but that is a cruel fate.
Please enter your comment.
Your comment is added.
jade 8 years ago
Did she win anything besides the $1.85. It is a malfunction because it was for so much money, I hear this malfunction crap a lot. Degradation, if that is the cause then maybe these casinos should keep up on their maintenance and if they don't, well................
Please enter your comment.
Your comment is added.
Magic Flowers 8 years ago
malfunction voids all wins... but what if the malfunction works backwards, giving no big wins in a statistical number of spins? then is just nature of the gambling they say, house must have edge favor to win, slots are random, can't be influenced etc makes you wonder...
Please enter your comment.
Your comment is added.