Facial Recognition at Casinos

Anything related to casinos, casino games, new casinos, tournaments etc.
Headline back 23
    2,000
    views
    9
    replies
    Last post ago over 3 years by Feelin froggy
    Archnye

    Readers of this topic also read:

    Please or register to post or comment.
      • Archnye
        • Started by
          admin
          5669
        • last active 9 hrs ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • 2d4818989f1ca7ccfaccc9b2527a6916
        • Flapjack
        Hi LCB'ers,

        I just came across some interesting news in New Zealand. It seems that a casino, SkyCity, is going to add facial recognition technology to locate the banned gamblers in the crowd. A database of photos of problem gamblers will be used to match the players in the casino.

        Here's how it will work:
        1. SkyCity scans in a photograph of a banned problem gambler, either self-barred or excluded by the casino company.
        2. All people in the casino are subject to scanning, picking up identifying facial features and movements.
        3. The scanner references those in the scanner against the same distinctive features on photographs of banned gamblers.
        4. Any match of the banned gambler with someone inside the casino alerts security to a possible barred person.

        I wonder how well this will work. I mean you could be sitting at a slot machine and be mistaken for a banned player. What do you think of facial recognition in casinos and the possibility of this coming to a casino near you?
      • Thsuper31
        • Replied by
          Mighty! Member
          2970
        • last active 2 months ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Archnye
        I don't much foresee any problems. The original problem gambler has to have a photo scanned for the programme (and I'll wager name, DOB are included).
        If security comes across a player who 'appears' to be said person, it's all rather cleared up quickly when comparing photos and ID
      • No avatar normal
        • Replied by
          Super Hero
          1016
        • last active 12 hrs ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Archnye
        I have some pretty heavy bets that Las Vegas casinos, particularly the larger corporation ones have already had that technology installed.  Yet probably no one outside of the surveillance, owner, and finance team knows about it.
        Mainly because that's the problem that plagues casinos these days.  Is when a barred or self excluded player actually comes back in.  Either A to feed that need or B do whatever dirty act again that got them barred in the first place.
        Causes a casino a large amount of issues.
        For the excluded gambler, like here in Iowa.
        -If a casino doesn't act upon a known problem gambler being in the casino within a certain period of time or actually allows a problem gambler to leave with there profits.  This could actually result in a fine for the actual casino company.  Plus have trespassing charges brought upon the problem gambler.
        If the person is simply barred:
        This could cause an issue mainly because they must have done something wrong.  Either A it being cheating, B getting too drunk, or C whatever would cause someone to get banned.  Then it could cause for the problem to be reinstated.

        As long as when they do approach you.  They don't cause a scene or cause much embarrassment.  I don't see this being an issue.  I'd imagine it would at first be a simple, asking for your ID.  Then calling up to Surveillance, and verifying against the database.  To see if the ID and information matches.
        I don't see this being an exact issue.
        Yet if they make it like some big sting like atmosphere I would probably be a bit scarred off to never come back again.  Especially if it was a mistake.  It would even probably scare the problem gambler away too.
      • Index
        • Replied by
          admin
          2086
        • online

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Archnye
        I believe the technology itself isnt that new (which leads me to believe that you may be right cheetahwind).

        Every technology has its flaws, but as long as there is a person controling the whole process I dont see many possible issues.
      • Index
        • Replied by
          Hero Member
          870
        • last active 4 months ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Archnye
        I don't really see the need in facial recognition, they should just start scanning everyone's ID instead of 30 being the cut off. It would save all the confusion and mistakes with facial features. 
      • Index
        • Replied by
          admin
          20464
        • last active 1 hour ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Archnye
        I think it's definitely a necessity however, a "good" problem gambler will know these casinos will have this software and no doubt wear a disguise!

        There was a case recently where a known problem gambler was allowed in, they lost millions and the gambler sued the casino because they let them in.  I can see this software will certainly pay for itself in a very short time.
      • 2d4818989f1ca7ccfaccc9b2527a6916
        • Replied by
          admin
          3697
        • last active 3 hrs ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Archnye
        Facial recognition is already used by law enforcement so I don't think there will be problems with that, as long as they verify the results on the computer with their own eyes.
      • Index
        • Replied by
          Sr.Newbie
          42
        • last active 7 months ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Archnye
        fried-eggs wrote:

        I don't really see the need in facial recognition, they should just start scanning everyone's ID instead of 30 being the cut off. It would save all the confusion and mistakes with facial features. 



        It is nothing but commitment to providing the safest possible environment for the players..
      • Archnye
        • Replied by
          admin
          5669
        • last active 9 hrs ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Index
        fried-eggs wrote:

        I don't really see the need in facial recognition, they should just start scanning everyone's ID instead of 30 being the cut off. It would save all the confusion and mistakes with facial features. 


        It would definitely be the much cheaper option but could imagine the lines to get in?

      lcb activities in the last 24 hours

      • 30
        new members
      • 660
        members online
      • 20933
        guests online
      • 82
        new posts
      • 10621
        free games played
      Join the club

      Most viewed forum topics

      • Index
        A lot of members have said they are not keen on some of the casinos available in the Shop. Many of you requested Intertops, which has been added in the last week however, I would love to hear about your favourite...
        Which Casinos would you like to see in the LCB Shop?
      • Index
        Introducing the newest member of the bgo casino family, PowerSpins.com, where you get free spins every day.Log in at powerspins.com now using your bgo username and password where 50 free spins are waiting for you - no...
        Power Spins Casino No Deposit
      • Index
        Dear LCBers, Everum casino is giving away free spins every time a new slot has been released to the fastest players who post their casino usernames here on this thread. Please note: US players are not allowed to...
        Exclusive Express Promos at Everum Casino

      Join today and start earning rewards

      You will immediately get full access to our online casino forum/chat plus receive our newsletter with news & exclusive bonuses every month.
      S logo
      Select Language
      Search
      Search Results

      Report to moderator

      Use this function to inform the moderators and administrator of an abusive or wrongly posted message.

      Please note that your email address will be revealed to the moderators if you use this

      Submit