Simon Cowell's Show Investigated Portraying Gambling as Glamorous

Feel free to talk about anything and everything in this board.
Headline back 2
    1,469
    views
    7
    replies
    Last post ago almost 5 years by Lipstick
    Img 20160318 141312

    Feelin froggy

    • admin
    • female
    • offline
    • 2921
      thanks given
    • 4698
      thanks received

    Readers of this topic also read:

    Please or register to post or comment.
      • Img 20160318 141312

        Feelin froggy

        • admin
        • female
        • offline
        • 2921
          thanks given
        • 4698
          thanks received
        • Started by
          admin
          5,637
        • last active 5 hrs ago
        There was a show on TV in the Uk called Red or Black. According to the Gambling Commission, it made Roulette look easy after 4 millionaires were made on the show by simply choosing red or black.

        A source told The Sun: 'Put it this way, if the Gambling Commission kicks up a big fuss about your show publicly, it is unlikely that you would go ahead with it.

        'The Commission has concerns the show is glamorising gambling as so many people won £1 million last time and did the best part of nothing to get it.'

        "If" the show gets back on air their will be some adjustments made to make it more appealing to viewers.

        A source explained: 'The idea is to inject a bit more jeopardy. We could have the red players versus the black players in some sort of challenge.'

        The ITV1 show was also a source of controversy when it came out that the first million pound winner, Nathan Hageman, served two-and-half years in jail for assault.

        Do you think a program that gives players the opportunity to win a life changing amount of money glamorizes gambling? I saw the show and thought it was all pure luck. Those people were simply very lucky that day. If gambling were easy wouldn't we all be millionaires one way or another?

        Aside from that, do you think that contestants should undergo a background check before being allowed to participate?

      • Index

        blueday

        • admin
        • offline
          • 18127
            thanks given
          • 9800
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            admin
            20,100
          • last active 5 hrs ago
          They absolutely should be given a background check before they go on shows such as this.  Not sure if you remember that guy who was on "Who wants to be a millionaire".  He used all his lives and only made it to £500!  Turned out he had something like 56 criminal offences against him in his past.  They took the money off him (not that it was much to win).  One of the rules on WWTBAM is that you cannot have a criminal record so yes, they should definitely do it for this show.

          As for glamorizing gambling, yes this show certainly did that.  They made it look (and it was) too easy to win £1mill.  They should make it as hard as the million pound drop!

          blue
        • 2d4818989f1ca7ccfaccc9b2527a6916

          Johnny Karp

          • admin
          • male
          • offline

          "Just play. Have fun. Enjoy the game." -- Michael Jordan

          • 6678
            thanks given
          • 2250
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            admin
            3,686
          • last active 17 hrs ago
          I don't know what to say because I don't know the situation very well. But I assume that the State Lottery has its draws broadcast on TV, right? And if so, doesn't that glamorize gambling as well? Moreover, anybody can win at the lottery, even a serial killer.
        • Img 20160318 141312

          Feelin froggy

          • admin
          • female
          • offline
          • 2921
            thanks given
          • 4698
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            admin
            5,637
          • last active 5 hrs ago

          Thanks for this post from:

          • 2d4818989f1ca7ccfaccc9b2527a6916
          I see both of your points. If its that easy to win I want to get on there.  The background check should be something implemented. It will save the 'ouch' of finding out that the person you've had on the show doesn't deserve a penny. Do you think that this has become a big deal because Simon is associated with the show?
        • Flapjack

          Markotik

          • admin
          • male
          • offline

          La justice poursuit le corps au-delà de toute souffrance possible. Michel Foucault (Surveiller et punir)

          • 4767
            thanks given
          • 3347
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            admin
            4,782
          • last active 1 hour ago
          Unbelievable Anyone willing to show off on television has a great chance to win, I guess. But criminals... there should be rules about it. And I wish it was that easy to win anything, that's for sure!
        • Index

          blueday

          • admin
          • offline
            • 18127
              thanks given
            • 9800
              thanks received
            • Replied by
              admin
              20,100
            • last active 5 hrs ago
            Feelin froggy wrote:

            I see both of your points. If its that easy to win I want to get on there.  The background check should be something implemented. It will save the 'ouch' of finding out that the person you've had on the show doesn't deserve a penny. Do you think that this has become a big deal because Simon is associated with the show?


            Yes I think it has Froggy.  If Simon wasn't associated with it, I'm sure it would have all been fine and dandy.

            For some reason (probably his arrogance), the media loves to hate Simon.

            blue
          • Putting on lipstick emoticon 1

            Lipstick

            • admin
            • female
            • offline
            • 6795
              thanks given
            • 10287
              thanks received
            • Replied by
              admin
              12,319
            • last active 4 hrs ago
            That's a tough call about the background check. To penalize someone for example who already served their time would be a form of discrimination. I am not quite sure how or where they would draw the line as to who is qualified to participate.

            Lips

          lcb activities in the last 24 hours

          • 24
            new members
          • 619
            members online
          • 14017
            guests online
          • 197
            new posts
          • 2420
            free games played
          Join the club

          Most viewed forum posts

          Join today and start earning rewards

          You will immediately get full access to our online casino forum/chat plus receive our newsletter with news & exclusive bonuses every month.
          S logo
          Select Language
          Search
          Search Results

          Report to moderator

          Use this function to inform the moderators and administrator of an abusive or wrongly posted message.

          Please note that your email address will be revealed to the moderators if you use this

          Submit
          39012170