Social Networks in a hiring process

Feel free to talk about anything and everything in this board.
Headline back 23
    Last post ago almost 5 years by Mission146

    Readers of this topic also read:

    Please or register to post or comment.
      • Flapjack
        • Started by
        • online
        Hi everyone,

        What do you think about using social network profiles to check the applicants? It's becoming widely used and since a few years ago very popular among the employers. I read some studies which show that employers even make their decisions based on Facebook, Twitter or MySpace profiles (35%).

        And some of the reasons are:

        Candidate posted
                                      - provocative or inappropriate photographs or information,

                                      - content about them drinking or using drugs

                          - bad-mouthed their previous employer, co-workers or clients

                          -  showed poor communication skills

                          - made discriminatory comments

                          - lied about qualifications

                          - shared confidential information from previous employer

        It certainly has its advantages and I can understand employers to a certain extent but is it really necessary.  Of course, there's a question about the individual freedom.
      • Index
        • Replied by
        • last active 4 hrs ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Flapjack
        Yes I have heard of this. 

        One person I know was offered a job and it was then retracted because of their facebook profile.  The thing is, in England, it is actually illegal to give a poor reference to a new employer i.e. they can't voice an opinion on their ex employee only tell them the simple questions they are asked like amount of sickness and whether they were punctual or not etc. so I guess facebook is a great way to get the lowdown on someone.

      • Avatar 10150
        • Replied by
          Mighty! Member
        • last active 4 months ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Flapjack
        There's been several instances where employees have been fired for what they said or did. That's why you have a choice to either keep your opinions to yourself, of have another outlet for your anger.

        Personally, I never got on FB, I did sign up but never went back, I had a very stressful time with one company and so I would rant on and believe me, I felt so good afterward.

        Never used names, but positions.
      • Avatar 7881
        • Replied by
          Super Hero
        • last active 4 months ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Flapjack
        • 2d4818989f1ca7ccfaccc9b2527a6916
        We do checks at my businesses.  And that includes FB.  Folks, plenty of seemingly "normal" people have odd double lives.  A clue to this double life, if one exists, is on FB. 

        Also, we have a policy if any employee talks badly (that includes internet posts) about the company, then they are fired immediately.  Working is not a right.  You need to have excellent work ethic, marketable skills, and get along with people....or time to hit-the-road.
      • Archnye
        • Replied by
        • last active 3 hrs ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Flapjack
        The bank I used to work for wouldn't allow employees to mention the bank name of FB. If they did, they were asked to remove it.

        I'm not sure how I feel about this. I'm torn. I agree with it to a certain extent but I could see how one person may have a sense of humor that another doesn't agree with. It doesn't make them a bad person or unworthy of a job. If there were serious issues on their FB or Titter accounts then I could see a reason not to hire. But it's about the work isn't it? Then again if they were soliciting prostitution on their accounts then I could understand not hiring them. See i'm torn...
      • Flapjack
        • Replied by
        • online
        Yes, I see the benefits of checking the profiles and especially if an employee talks bad about a company, that doesn't really make sense. 

        Feelin froggy wrote:

        but I could see how one person may have a sense of humor that another doesn't agree with. It doesn't make them a bad person or unworthy of a job.

        And also agree with this... if someone has a weird sense of humor that doesn't really makes them a bad person. And what about locked profiles? What if an employee or an applicant have their profiles locked, could someone be fired because of that? One might think that they are hiding something. 
      • Dream rj small transparant
        • Replied by
          Super Hero
        • last active 3 days ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Flapjack
        this is one reason why i do not have a facebook account, best way in my opinion

        and if they asked why, i would just say because i do not like it for privacy reasons. (fullstop)

      • 2d4818989f1ca7ccfaccc9b2527a6916
        • Replied by
        • last active 12 hrs ago
        I would check a person's facebook profile before hiring him or her, absolutely.

        And I also think that talking badly about your employer on a social network is not acceptable. If you have something to say, say it inside the company. Still unsatisfied? Quit the job and that's that.
      • Pierce 1
        • Replied by
          Jr. Member
        • last active 2 days ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • 2d4818989f1ca7ccfaccc9b2527a6916
        • Flapjack
        I think it is very important for people to realize that Facebook is in the public Forum (unless your Page is Private) so you wouldn't want to say anything about your employer there (or post any pictures, etc.) that you would not hand directly to your employer or the person interviewing you.

        There are many counter-arguments that people will bring up concerning privacy, but I don't think they are relevant.  For starters, in the United States, there is no explicitly guaranteed right to privacy.  There are laws against voyeurism, in some jurisdictions, against eavesdropping, unlawful recording, etc., but no specific right to privacy.

        Furthermore, Facebook is not a private matter, it is a public matter.  That is the nature, scope, intent and purpose of Facebook.  E-Mails are not even private, unless the privacyis explicitly agreed to prior to the E-Mail communication, or enforced by the sender explicitly.

        The point of the matter is that the Facebook user is giving everyone free access to this information.  I know that in the State of Ohio, though, I don't technically need to give someone a reason for my refusal to hire them, and in a right-to-work jurisdiction, such as Ohio, I don't even have to have a reason to fire them...I just cannot fire them for a reason that is illegal. 

        Facebook is actually one of the LEAST invasive things that an employer can do with/without your knowledge and consent.  With your knowledge and consent, you may be subject to a drug test(s), criminal background check, having your credit pulled, anything along those lines.

        An employer who is determined, without your consent, can run your name through the database of every County you have ever lived in to determine everything down to traffic tickets.  He can't tell you he did that, but it is easy enough for him to do, again, if he is so's public record.  An employer, in the U.S., cannot ask you if you are married, but he can go to the County (or Counties) you live in/have lived in and run your name through that database to see if there is a marriage license.  He can find out if you have been divorced.

        Trust me, an individual puts his/her own pictures/posts on Facebook, so looking through the things that you, yourself, have essentially provided in the public Forum, and effectively, to the employer, is not even remotely close to the most invasive things an employer can do.

        I wouldn't hire anyone that talked fecal matter on a previous employer directly to me, so why would I hire someone who does so on Facebook?  If they'll disparage an organization (even if the statements are true) in the public venue when that organization signs/signed their paychecks, then what would make me believe they'll not disparage my company?

      lcb activities in the last 24 hours

      • 36
        new members
      • 733
        members online
      • 20224
        guests online
      • 90
        new posts
      • 9275
        free games played
      Join the club

      Most viewed forum topics

      • Index
        A lot of members have said they are not keen on some of the casinos available in the Shop. Many of you requested Intertops, which has been added in the last week however, I would love to hear about your favourite...
        Which Casinos would you like to see in the LCB Shop?
      • Index
        Introducing the newest member of the bgo casino family,, where you get free spins every day.Log in at now using your bgo username and password where 50 free spins are waiting for you - no...
        Power Spins Casino No Deposit
      • Index
        Dear LCBers, Everum casino is giving away free spins every time a new slot has been released to the fastest players who post their casino usernames here on this thread. Please note: US players are not allowed to...
        Exclusive Express Promos at Everum Casino

      Join today and start earning rewards

      You will immediately get full access to our online casino forum/chat plus receive our newsletter with news & exclusive bonuses every month.
      S logo
      Select Language
      Search Results

      Report to moderator

      Use this function to inform the moderators and administrator of an abusive or wrongly posted message.

      Please note that your email address will be revealed to the moderators if you use this