US Homeland Security Warns of Cyber Attack - Scare tactic?

Feel free to talk about anything and everything in this board.
Headline back 2
    1,349
    views
    10
    replies
    Last post ago almost 4 years by Lipstick
    Putting on lipstick emoticon 1

    Lipstick

      admin
    • female
    • offline
    • 6795
      thanks given
    • 10276
      thanks received
    • Started by
      admin
      12,317
    • last active 16 hrs ago

    Readers of this topic also read:

    Please or register to post or comment.
      • Putting on lipstick emoticon 1

        Lipstick

          admin
        • female
        • offline
        • 6795
          thanks given
        • 10276
          thanks received
        • Started by
          admin
          12,317
        • last active 16 hrs ago
        US Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is urging Congress to pass legislation allowing the government to have greater control over the Internet.

        Her in her announcement she claims that inaction could result in a “cyber 9/11” attack that could knock out water, electricity and gas, causing destruction similar to that left behind by Hurricane Sandy.

        Napolitano said that in order to prevent such an attack, Congress must pass legislation that gives the US government greater access to the Internet and cybersecurity information from the private sector. Such a bill, known as CISPA or Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, was already introduced last year, but failed to pass in Congress due to concerns expressed by businesses and privacy advocates.

        “We shouldn’t wait until there is a 9/11 in the cyber world. There are things we can and should be doing right now that, if not prevent, would mitigate the extent of the damage,” Napolitano said in a speech at the Wilson Center, a Washington, DC think tank.

        Do you think this is a major concern that the gov should step in or is this a scare tactic to accept and allow Big Brother to be over our shoulder on the Wide World Web? But then again aren't they already?

        Lips

      • Img 20160318 141312

        Feelin froggy

          admin
        • female
        • offline
        • 2899
          thanks given
        • 4687
          thanks received
        • Replied by
          admin
          5,634
        • last active 13 hrs ago
        I don't know what to say about this. Seriously, it would be nice to live some aspect of life without the government invading.
      • Index

        blueday

          admin
        • online
          • 18114
            thanks given
          • 9777
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            admin
            20,080
          • online
          "allowing the government to have greater control over the Internet"

          Isn't this just another similar action at stopping gambling but instead of gambling, your entire life.  Government's have too much say in what we can and can't do.  Enough already. 

          blue
        • 2d4818989f1ca7ccfaccc9b2527a6916

          Johnny Karp

            admin
          • male
          • offline

          "Just play. Have fun. Enjoy the game." -- Michael Jordan

          • 6672
            thanks given
          • 2250
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            admin
            3,684
          • last active 1 day ago
          The US governm
          lipstick_xoxos wrote:

          But then again aren't they already?


          I guess they are, but not as effectively as they would want to. I hope this bill won't pass, there is a fine line between fighting terrorism and terrorising your own people, but they should be careful not to cross that line.
        • Flapjack

          Markotik

            admin
          • male
          • offline

          La justice poursuit le corps au-delà de toute souffrance possible. Michel Foucault (Surveiller et punir)

          • 4764
            thanks given
          • 3346
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            admin
            4,781
          • last active 1 hour ago
          Johnny Karp wrote:

          but they should be careful not to cross that line.


          I'm sure they will cross the line, but not only in US but everywhere else. 
        • Index

          chillymellow

            Mighty! Member
          • female
          • offline
          ...chillymellow...
          My turn to play bingo!
          • 1051
            thanks given
          • 1114
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            Mighty! Member
            3,586
          • last active 23 days ago
          Don't you think they are trying to pass legislation to cover their butts for what they are already doing?  The US has been fighting hackers since computers were invented.  They know everything you do on the internet already.  They taped all phone conversations and run them through programs looking for keywords that indicate "terrorist" (or kids talking about pot) activities. 

          Isn't there a problem with them micromanaging everyone?  We are individuals with inalienable rights.  Hah!  Can I please pursue some happiness?  Uncle, may I?
        • Putting on lipstick emoticon 1

          Lipstick

            admin
          • female
          • offline
          • 6795
            thanks given
          • 10276
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            admin
            12,317
          • last active 16 hrs ago
          Yes i agree they already doing it and its a smoke screen to even ask for the Gov to step in on a massive cyber attack. Whether or not big corporations want it or not the Gov is gonna do what they want to do plain and simple!

          Lips
        • No avatar normal

          bongo

            Super Hero
          • male
          • offline
          • 684
            thanks given
          • 693
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            Super Hero
            1,560
          • last active 3 days ago

          Thanks for this post from:

          • 2d4818989f1ca7ccfaccc9b2527a6916
                      As long as it doesn't affect the price of beer,  I honestly don't lose sleep worrying over this stuff.LOL
        • Nirvana

          orren

            Full Member
          • offline
          "If life didn't suck half the time, we would take the great things for granted...."

                                              -orren
          • 105
            thanks given
          • 38
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            Full Member
            150
          • last active about 1 month ago
          It would likely be far less expensive and immensely more effective to have safety protocol regarding the type of threats mentioned against public utilities. To have safeties and bypass's in place that are controlled manually. There can be no threat of these sort if systems do not entirely rely on computers or at least be setup in a manor where they can shut down the computer and still at least partially control the system.

          You know, like how things were run before computers existed.... It should not be too difficult to set up systems that can be maintained without, say.... Electricity. With isolated backup systems for machinery and program files which should already be in place, I see no reason for such a bill to pass.
        • Putting on lipstick emoticon 1

          Lipstick

            admin
          • female
          • offline
          • 6795
            thanks given
          • 10276
            thanks received
          • Replied by
            admin
            12,317
          • last active 16 hrs ago

          Thanks for this post from:

          • Nirvana
          Absolutely right on orren. And i am sure there is back up systems. Couldn't agree more with ya.

        lcb activities in the last 24 hours

        • 36
          new members
        • 638
          members online
        • 21794
          guests online
        • 87
          new posts
        • 2809
          free games played
        Join the club

        Most viewed forum posts

        • Putting on lipstick emoticon 1
          Hi LCB'ers,Here is a list of freebies that are not on the weekly code list. This list includes casinos to check your acct, call/email for free chip and casinos not listed here at our forum.  I will update this list on...
          More Free Chips
        • 200 zpsnwkvewod
          Hello dear LCBers,LimoPlay Casino has something special in stored for you!!Each week Vitali, the lovely casino representative from LimoPlay will be posting a new contest. Please subscribe to this thread by clicking on...
          Win free spins and more every week with LimoPlay
        • Putting on lipstick emoticon 1
          LCB $250 August Contest – Lets Play Roulette     Hi LCB'ers because of the launch of the new site design i had to temporarily close this contest. Lets start fresh - for any member that may have already enterted a...
          CLOSED - LCB $250 August Contest – Lets Play Roulette

        Join today and start earning rewards

        You will immediately get full access to our online casino forum/chat plus receive our newsletter with news & exclusive bonuses every month.
        S logo
        Select Language
        Search
        Search Results

        Report to moderator

        Use this function to inform the moderators and administrator of an abusive or wrongly posted message.

        Please note that your email address will be revealed to the moderators if you use this

        Submit
        39012170