US Homeland Security Warns of Cyber Attack - Scare tactic?

    1,392
    views
    10
    replies
    Last post ago about 4 years by Lipstick
    Putting on lipstick emoticon 1
    • Started by
      admin
      12451
    • last active 4 hrs ago
    Headline back 23

    Readers of this topic also read:

    Please or register to post or comment.
      • Putting on lipstick emoticon 1
        • Started by
          admin
          12451
        • last active 4 hrs ago
        US Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is urging Congress to pass legislation allowing the government to have greater control over the Internet.

        Her in her announcement she claims that inaction could result in a “cyber 9/11” attack that could knock out water, electricity and gas, causing destruction similar to that left behind by Hurricane Sandy.

        Napolitano said that in order to prevent such an attack, Congress must pass legislation that gives the US government greater access to the Internet and cybersecurity information from the private sector. Such a bill, known as CISPA or Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, was already introduced last year, but failed to pass in Congress due to concerns expressed by businesses and privacy advocates.

        “We shouldn’t wait until there is a 9/11 in the cyber world. There are things we can and should be doing right now that, if not prevent, would mitigate the extent of the damage,” Napolitano said in a speech at the Wilson Center, a Washington, DC think tank.

        Do you think this is a major concern that the gov should step in or is this a scare tactic to accept and allow Big Brother to be over our shoulder on the Wide World Web? But then again aren't they already?

        Lips

      • Archnye
        • Replied by
          admin
          5695
        • last active 43 min ago
        I don't know what to say about this. Seriously, it would be nice to live some aspect of life without the government invading.
      • Index
        • Replied by
          admin
          19726
        • last active 2 hrs ago
        "allowing the government to have greater control over the Internet"

        Isn't this just another similar action at stopping gambling but instead of gambling, your entire life.  Government's have too much say in what we can and can't do.  Enough already. 

        blue
      • 2d4818989f1ca7ccfaccc9b2527a6916
        • Replied by
          admin
          3701
        • last active 2 hrs ago
        The US governm
        lipstick_xoxos wrote:

        But then again aren't they already?


        I guess they are, but not as effectively as they would want to. I hope this bill won't pass, there is a fine line between fighting terrorism and terrorising your own people, but they should be careful not to cross that line.
      • Flapjack
        • Replied by
          admin
          4900
        • online
        Johnny Karp wrote:

        but they should be careful not to cross that line.


        I'm sure they will cross the line, but not only in US but everywhere else. 
      • Index
        • Replied by
          Mighty! Member
          3578
        • last active 13 hrs ago
        Don't you think they are trying to pass legislation to cover their butts for what they are already doing?  The US has been fighting hackers since computers were invented.  They know everything you do on the internet already.  They taped all phone conversations and run them through programs looking for keywords that indicate "terrorist" (or kids talking about pot) activities. 

        Isn't there a problem with them micromanaging everyone?  We are individuals with inalienable rights.  Hah!  Can I please pursue some happiness?  Uncle, may I?
      • Putting on lipstick emoticon 1
        • Replied by
          admin
          12451
        • last active 4 hrs ago
        Yes i agree they already doing it and its a smoke screen to even ask for the Gov to step in on a massive cyber attack. Whether or not big corporations want it or not the Gov is gonna do what they want to do plain and simple!

        Lips
      • No avatar normal
        • Replied by
          Super Hero
          1589
        • last active 3 hrs ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • 2d4818989f1ca7ccfaccc9b2527a6916
                    As long as it doesn't affect the price of beer,  I honestly don't lose sleep worrying over this stuff.LOL
      • Nirvana
        • Replied by
          Full Member
          152
        • last active 9 days ago
        It would likely be far less expensive and immensely more effective to have safety protocol regarding the type of threats mentioned against public utilities. To have safeties and bypass's in place that are controlled manually. There can be no threat of these sort if systems do not entirely rely on computers or at least be setup in a manor where they can shut down the computer and still at least partially control the system.

        You know, like how things were run before computers existed.... It should not be too difficult to set up systems that can be maintained without, say.... Electricity. With isolated backup systems for machinery and program files which should already be in place, I see no reason for such a bill to pass.
      • Putting on lipstick emoticon 1
        • Replied by
          admin
          12451
        • last active 4 hrs ago

        Thanks for this post from:

        • Nirvana
        Absolutely right on orren. And i am sure there is back up systems. Couldn't agree more with ya.

      lcb activities in the last 24 hours

      • 35
        new members
      • 858
        members online
      • 16434
        guests online
      • 107
        new posts
      • 11073
        free games played
      Join the club

      Most viewed forum topics

      • Whatisthatnoise zps9339a8ec
        You've made a deposit and gone straight away to one of your favorite games. Sadly, your bankroll has dwindled down to a zero balance.  There is nothing left to do but close the virtual  window on another Jackpot dream...
        Penny for your thoughts...
      • Index
        Jackpot Luck Casino - Exclusive Free Spins New players only - No US! Amount: 25 free spins on “Starburst” How to claim the bonus: Players need to sign up through our LINK and the free spins will be added...
        Jackpot Luck Casino Exclusive Free Spins
      • Avatar 6303
        Hello,  I have waiting 4 weeks for a 600.00 payout i requested and it was declined for unknown reasons.I have had no problems till now and i really need this winnings.My car died and has been fixed but im short...
        Raging bull no pay

      Join today and start earning rewards

      You will immediately get full access to our online casino forum/chat plus receive our newsletter with news & exclusive bonuses every month.
      S logo
      Select Language
      Search
      Search Results

      Report to moderator

      Use this function to inform the moderators and administrator of an abusive or wrongly posted message.

      Please note that your email address will be revealed to the moderators if you use this

      Submit
      39012170